The Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) is a common fiscal tool used by governments to generate revenue from the transfer of real estate. However, there are specific exceptions that aim to safeguard citizens and businesses from undue financial burdens when certain events occur. Two noteworthy exceptions that deserve attention are the forcible disposal of real estate due to expropriation for public benefit and the temporary disposal of real estate as a guarantee for financing or credit.
1. Forcible Disposal Due to Expropriation for Public Benefit
Expropriation, or the compulsory acquisition of property, typically occurs when the government requires private land for public use, such as infrastructure development or public projects. Under normal circumstances, the transfer of property would be subject to the Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT). However, when a property is forcibly expropriated for public benefit, the RETT exception comes into play.
In these cases, the person whose real estate is expropriated (the “disposer”) is not the one making the decision to dispose of the property. The transaction is involuntary, and the disposer has no control over the timing or manner of the transfer. This exception seeks to alleviate the financial strain on citizens who face the loss of their property for the greater good of society.
It’s important to note that this exception is applicable only in cases where the expropriation is executed according to the law governing the expropriation of real estate for public benefit. If the expropriation is related to paying a debt, enforcing a judgment, or resolving a dispute In this case, it is subject to the RETT, and the exclusion does not apply.
2. Temporary Disposal of Real Estate for Financing or Credit
Another notable exception to the RETT applies to situations where real estate is temporarily disposed of as collateral for financing or credit. This typically involves the transfer of ownership of real estate to a financier or creditor as a form of guarantee for a debt.
The key to this exception is that the transfer is temporary. The property owner does not permanently give up ownership of the real estate. Instead, it is transferred to the creditor with an agreement that the property will be returned once the debt is paid off. This arrangement is often seen in the case of mortgages or other financial agreements where real estate serves as a security for the loan.
This exception ensures that no RETT is levied on temporary transfers of real estate, as long as the transaction does not result in a permanent transfer of ownership. It also includes cases where the property is returned to the original owner after the full repayment of the debt. Essentially, this exemption prevents the imposition of RETT on property transfers that are strictly related to securing or paying off debt, without any permanent change in ownership.
Conclusion
Both of these exceptions to the Real Estate Transfer Tax are designed to protect individuals from undue financial burdens in specific situations. The first exception helps mitigate the impact of compulsory expropriation, while the second provides relief for property owners who temporarily transfer their real estate as collateral for financing or credit. By understanding these exceptions, individuals and businesses can better navigate their legal and financial obligations, ensuring they are not unfairly taxed during these exceptional circumstances.
Summary
This article discusses two key exceptions to the Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT). The first exception applies to forcible disposals of real estate due to expropriation for public benefit, where the property owner has no control over the transfer. In these cases, the RETT is not imposed. The second exception involves the temporary disposal of real estate as collateral for financing or credit, such as in mortgages, where ownership is temporarily transferred to a creditor but returned to the owner after the debt is paid off. These exceptions aim to protect individuals from unnecessary financial burden in specific circumstances.
Disclaimer: The Content offer general guidance and should not be considered legal, financial, or tax advice. Consult qualified professionals for personalized guidance. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, no guarantee is provided for completeness or applicability to individual situations. Users are responsible for their interpretation and actions based on this information, at their own risk.
For understanding more about Corporate Tax, VAT, Excise Tax, Financial Services, and Advisory Services, reach out to us at : contact@acme-group.me | +971 52 740 1169
This article was published on 31 May 2025.
Related Posts
Saudi Arabia’s New Zakat Amendment (MR 1248): What Changed for Real Estate Developers in 2025
In June 2025, Saudi Arabia issued Ministerial Resolution No. 1248, amending Article 73 of the Executive Regulations for Zakat Collection (MR 1007). …
Who is a Zakat Payer? Demystifying Residency and Activity Requirements
A critical first step in Zakat compliance is accurately identifying if you, or your business, are considered a “Zakat Payer” under Saudi …
TOGC & Cessation in Saudi VAT: Understanding The New Obligations
Under the 2025 VAT amendments, Saudi Arabia has elevated the importance of Transfer of Going Concern (TOGC) rules and cessation requirements for …
Excise Tax Returns in KSA: What to Report and When
Every Excise Registrant in KSA must file bi-monthly Excise Tax Returns, aligned with the state’s fiscal year. Returns must be submitted within …
Calculating Your Zakat: The 2.5% Rate and Zakat Base Explained
The 2.5% Zakat Rate Standard Rate A uniform rate of 5% applies to the Zakat Base for a Hijri year. Reflects the …
Join our Newsletter!
Receive updates on the latest News, Events, Webinar and more.
Our Services
-
Tax ServicesTax Services
-
Financial ServicesFinancial Services
-
AdvisoryAdvisory
-
ComplianceCompliance
Explore More
-
About UsAbout Us
-
Privacy PolicyPrivacy Policy
-
Contact UsContact Us